4- Offers a thorough and insightful response to the prompt. Uses specific evidence from the text to support ideas.
3- Response lacks insight and may seem generic. Response is technically correct, but may only skim of the surface in addressing all parts of the prompt. The student only discusses text evidence in very general terms (i.e. “Tita’s mother always told her what to do, but Tita finally stood up for herself.”)
2- Response may not answer all parts of the question. Some of the accuracy of the response is questionable or offer insufficient explanation. The response lacks supporting evidence from the text.
1 – Response is too brief. It may wander off topic or include some incorrect statements. The response is lacking in text details and does not show sufficient knowledge of the text.
Less than 1 – The student does not answer the question or the response is illegible or irrelevant. Statements made about the text are completely incorrect and show a marked lack of knowledge of the text and the concepts being addressed.
3- Response lacks insight and may seem generic. Response is technically correct, but may only skim of the surface in addressing all parts of the prompt. The student only discusses text evidence in very general terms (i.e. “Tita’s mother always told her what to do, but Tita finally stood up for herself.”)
2- Response may not answer all parts of the question. Some of the accuracy of the response is questionable or offer insufficient explanation. The response lacks supporting evidence from the text.
1 – Response is too brief. It may wander off topic or include some incorrect statements. The response is lacking in text details and does not show sufficient knowledge of the text.
Less than 1 – The student does not answer the question or the response is illegible or irrelevant. Statements made about the text are completely incorrect and show a marked lack of knowledge of the text and the concepts being addressed.